Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | richard___'s commentslogin

you are projecting


you dont know me, so I don't know on what basis you make this claim, boycotting Elon and his companies is a real thing people do for ethical reasons, see Tesla sales as a data point


Is it not obvious to the Meta employees that the purpose of this data is to replace them? Combined with the job cuts... surprised they haven't revolted or unionized already


Don't you realize that by using Codex or Claude, you are providing data to them that they will also use in an attempt to replace you?


anthropic did it first and likely better, but good to see competition


Arguments like this require more reasoning than “because history”.


What's different this time around?

The author made compelling points regarding capex cycles and supply/demand imbalances. So how does NVDA continue to deliver these returns over the next 10 years? Are the 4 firms driving >60% of NVDA's revenue going to maintain that high capex?

All it will take is a market shock that forces just one of these companies to pivot modes from spending to cost cutting for NVDA's bottom line to see material compression. This is not to say that NVDA will disappear, but it's a very real risk that sets the stage for contagion given how coupled all this growth is.


Arguments against history require more reasoning. Patterns emerge because that's how the systems work. "This time it will be different" require justification about why the system has significantly changed. The article makes a strong case for why the system hasn't changed.


The solution is latex


Thanks for this.

It's a very beautiful language, it's quite simple, if you like simple.


Why is self-distillation necessary? Why can't they get the ground-truth for "skipping" steps?


My issue with this article is the author writes about them in a frame that says “they are so quirky and this makes them cool / good” when really they are a bunch of degenerates.


I really didn't get that vibe at all. If anything, he seems pretty balanced in his appraisal of SF.


I don't get that at all. He is taking the piss somewhat, but not in some cases he's sympathetic (warehouse twinks) sometimes disapproving (eugenicists )


Complete bs.


great feedback


excellent comment


The issue is not humans posting but humans strongly prompting the AIs to post, which their captcha does nothing to resolve


Why is that an issue? Isn't that the entire point? You can have a casual conversation with your agent via whatever your favorite chat app is, and they make posts, collect feedback, and communicate back interesting findings and conversations to their humans.

Sending out a good post leads to a massive chain reaction of other agents who are interested in such things seeing the post, working through the concepts, and providing their own unique feedback which may or may not be valuable.

My openclaw agent will also post on moltbook about interesting news articles it finds, or research, and then get feedback from the other agents, and then lets me know if there's anything interesting there.

On my end it just feels like I'm having a conversation with a social media addicted friend who I can easily ignore or engage with on any given issue without having to fall down the social media rabbit hole myself. IMO this is a much more pleasant social media experience. No ads, no ragebait, no spam or reply bots trying to get my attention. Just my one, well trained, openclaw buddy.


I think the issue is pretending the agents are all acting autonomously when they do outrageous or even mildly interesting things, but it’s all prompted behavior and not truly emergent behavior.


Because the idea is that those are agents communicating, not humans LARPing.


Whoever told you that never used the platform and never understood what it was for.


> A Social Network for AI Agents

> Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

???????


Don’t believe everything you read on the internet


So the point is to be able to have a conversation while avoiding all the big downsides of social media?

Seems like it would be better to just remove those downsides (ads, ragebait, spam, etc) in the first place


He is trolling to increase the stock price before IPO


OK, but seriously... if Anthropic is on the "best" path, aside from somehow nuking all AI research labs, an IPO would be the most socially responsible thing that they could do. Right?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: